midger wrote:I don't care how much you can bend them--slam them in a car door and they're toast.
It is an interesting video and it makes sense about transferring the stress by changing the rod angle. I've also seen folks * their rods in an effort to get knots through their tiptops and folks * flies in attempts to dislodge them from hangups. Guess that's a no-no, eh?
Most of my rod breakages were from operator error. All except one was the tip section. One I broke the butt section, but that was after I had closed the tailgate on that section.
I had two rods break of the same model. I think those were a design flaw, and not my fault.
In the video, I think Tim gave a good explanation of how stress is applied, and then relieved in different sections of the blank. It's not all that easy to break a rod when it's flexed on a fish(non salt/bluewater). In an indirect way, I think the video shows how hard it is to break a fish off with anything over 5lb tippet. With 5x, and well tied knots, you would have a difficult time breaking the tippet with a flexed rod. 3X would be close to breaking your rod if it has a progressive bend(not high sticking). I cannot remember the last time I actually broke a fish off on 3X. Pulled the fly, or straighten the hook, yeah, but not actually break the leader/tippet. A while back I snagged a big suckerfish in the back on 2X. I tried breaking it off with a straight pulled, and all that accomplished was to drag the fish in sideways, against the current.
Why I bring this up is, I've been reading a thread on another forum about being "under gunned" with lighter rods. Consensus(never get a real consensus on a fly fishing forum
) is, the rod is not the limiting factor for the amount of time it takes to land and release a fish. It's the angler.
briansII