RJH wrote:It isn't against the law. To each his own.......
RJH wrote:Yeah. You get the point. It is too bad sarcasm doesn't come through in typing.
I agree that fish shouldn't be put in the dirt and try to educate people against doing it.
I also agree that people shouldn't wade in H.C. and try to educate people against doing it.
It did look like that fish was a H.C. fish and I am down for the cause.
My above post was to point out the irony that people will say "to each his own" on one conservation topic regarding our resources and get all fired up about another one that has similar long term impact. I think I touched on that in the wading post.
And yes I stand by my statement that just because it isn't illegal, doesn't make it right.
RJH
RJH wrote:It isn't against the law. To each his own.......
Papasequoia wrote:C'mon Sasha, tell us what you really think, willya?
WanderingBlues wrote:Idaho boys in the house. How long would an outfitter last up there with that attitude? I'm bummed because I've dropped some coin in there.
Devinpreston wrote:Not surprised by the response from Kent! He is pretty rude out on Crowley as well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests