teejay wrote:My last trip report had over a hundred views but no responses. Not worth the time and trouble putting together a report.
teejay wrote:My last trip report had over a hundred views but no responses. Not worth the time and trouble putting together a report. Still getting out though and finding fishable local creeks. Perhaps though it’s as Midger mentioned ,“if you’ve seen one small trout, you’ve seen them all, and most folks on here know what the locals look like by now”.
NorcalBob wrote:I've noticed this also and I just had a PM exchange with a highly respected FFA member discussing this issue and we both independently have reached the same conclusion. With the advent of instant internet communications, it serves no significant benefit to the OP (except for bragging rights!) to frequently post their fishing reports on the web. I have cut back significantly on my report posting (I'm still fishing more than ever) and so has the other individual. For now, I'm only going to post reports on significant exotic trips. As usual, YMMV!
WadeK wrote:Between not having a decent camera, not enough water to spread around, and having a few of my more sensitive spots get inundated with too many bait chucking trash dumpers, I've been reluctant to post much about my trips. I don't post specific locations, but even saying the Big Ditch means I'm going to see X amount more fisherman and trash at the Aquaduct, or wherever, in general if I say things went well. The lack of water is going to make all of this even worse this year. If 4 of my favorite ponds have gone dry or close enough, I can figure the next guy's 4 best ponds have dried up too, so we'll both have to move to the next best water and are 8 times as likely to meet, or something like that.
Papasequoia wrote:Judging by the pictures I think Mark needs to be reminded what a "hooter" is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 131 guests