87TT wrote: Number one, I broke the first one several times. The tip broke trying to retrieve fly from tree, jamming it while walking(clod that I am) falling on it, ect.
Chris123123 wrote:I am new to this forum, and I am a high school fly fisherman. I'm thinking about getting a Redington classic trout 8'6 4 weight fly rod and an orvis access II reel for General Sierra fishing. Anybody have any input on wether I should go shorter/lighter? Also I was wondering if there were any other good moderate action fly rods for around $200? Any feedback helps a lot!
fshflys wrote:87TT wrote: Number one, I broke the first one several times. The tip broke trying to retrieve fly from tree, jamming it while walking(clod that I am) falling on it, ect.
Do your homework, many of the rodmakers that have been around for a while have very good warranties, even in the price range you are looking at. Most charge nominal fee to repair/replace. Remember, automobiles are NOT a fly rods freind.
Chris123123 wrote:In my search, I also stumbled upon the cortland brook 864 4 wt 4 piece. Anybody have experience with these or heard anything about them? They sell them at a fly shop pretty close to me, so I was just curious.
WanderingBlues wrote:And don't rule out a better quality used rod.
briansII wrote:Chris123123 wrote:In my search, I also stumbled upon the cortland brook 864 4 wt 4 piece. Anybody have experience with these or heard anything about them? They sell them at a fly shop pretty close to me, so I was just curious.
The Cortland maybe a fine rod, but if it were me, I'd go with the Redington. Plenty of positive reviews on the Redington CT, and I know from personal experience, Redington's warranty dept is as good as anyone's. The CT is on sale at a cheaper price than the Cortland.
briansII