by BrownBear » August 20th, 2016, 9:35 pm
Had the opportunity to cast a Sage 890-4 X for about an hour today. Gotta say it's the first Sage that's impressed me in quite a while. It was parking lot casting with an unknown WF8 "shop" line that had suffered from previous asphalt adventures, but the rod simply didn't care. It easily picked up 40-45' of line off the ground, and with a single back cast threw an unbelievably smooth loop forward to reach 80'-85' almost without effort. Best of all, it was superbly accurate all the way out there. Both the shop owner and I were landing our casts within inches of called targets at all ranges, but the long accuracy was the most notable. Shorten the line up to 30', and the rod still registered "true" to line weight and handled that well. Seems like a really versatile and forgiving rod that will be useful for all sorts of things.
I have never been a 100% fan of the Sage One, in spite of casting and fishing lots of them. I just never could bring myself to reach into my wallet, mostly because the last couple of feet of the tip always seemed too soft for the spine or body of the blank. Lay a little extra on it for distance or to hook a cast at longer range, and the soft tip would collapse. Fine rod for moderate ranges, but problematic at longer ranges where I need extra performance.
Not so the X. We never really stretched it out to see just how far it would cast, but I'm confident that with the right line not chewed up by a parking lot, it would be pretty easy for me to threaten or surpass 100'. Can't make that claim about the One with any line I've tried, and the One is certainly no competitor of the X for accuracy except at lots closer ranges. Nice to note that the X seems a least as light and easy on the arm as the One.
Didn't reach for my wallet, but I'm already starting to feel a little haunted by the X.