Papasequoia wrote:If I had the time and know-how I would photoshop a picture of a mouse and a parachute and meld them together. Instead, you'll have to use your imaginations.
DrCreek wrote:The freaking Parachute Mouse. Thats excellent, Ray !
You know, over the years I've given this same situation alot of thought. Right or wrong or something inbetween, here's my partial theory.
Before the inception of the Parachute Adams, there was the Standard Adams. For years, the Standard Adams did an excellent job of imitating lots of different insects and pounding up trout. But I truly believe that over time, those trout (and their progeny) had developed some sense of fear for that pattern. All they know is that yesterday they tried to eat something that looked just like that... and it hurt like a biatch. I believe trout can become accustomed to seeing one particular thing so much that eventually they call "<oops>."
Enter the Parachute Adams. Someone ties himself up this way cool little dry mayfly imitation with a visible post (indicator) because he's getting older and so are his eyes, and he has one heck of a time seeing his old Standard Adams on the surface. The trout see this new fly that rides slightly differently in the surface film. "Hey! the trout thinks. "This doesn't look like one of those pieces of food that always hurts my mouth. I think I'm gonna take a chance and eat that !"
What I'm saying is (without giving the trout too much credit for having brains), I think the trout "get used to" seeing one thing and they get wise to it. So maybe (for me anyway) by switching back to a Standard Adams for a season or two, enough time has passed and the trout will once again take that Standard dry merely because they aren't used to seeing it and I'll have the jump on other flyfishermen that still throw the Parachute. Just my dumb little theory.
DrCreek wrote:Thank God it was just my own dumb, little theory.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests