REALTIME FLOWS    U. Kern: n/a cfs    L. Kern: 1341 cfs    E.W: 312 cfs    U. Owens: 108 cfs    L. Owens: 496 cfs   09/02/19 1:15 PM PST

Reel for my 0wt

For topics that don't seem to have a home elsewhere.

Re: Reel for my 0wt

Postby anacrime » August 27th, 2008, 12:08 am

midger wrote:Gabe,
I have to respectfully disagree about getting rid of the backing. It isn't there because you think you will get spooled. It's there to properly fill the reel to where the flyline comes to within about 1/8 inch of the reel pillars when loaded onto the spool, and it also allows for larger turns of the line on the spool thus increasing the line recovery rate. These larger diameter turns also result in less line twist/memory/coiling. I never load a small reel without backing. If the reel is very small, I'd use a Double Taper line, cut in half, with half set aside for reuse after wearing out the first half. I'd then add 100 yards of backing or whatever would make the remaining flyline load properly.

Just my take.

Yeah gabe, what this guy said.
"Whenever I see a photograph of some sportsman grinning over his kill, I am always impressed by the striking moral and aesthetic superiority of the dead animal to the live one."
-Edward Abbey
User avatar
anacrime
 
Posts: 1385
Joined: April 20th, 2008, 5:16 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Reel for my 0wt

Postby gabe » August 27th, 2008, 12:49 pm

anacrime wrote:
midger wrote:Gabe,
I have to respectfully disagree about getting rid of the backing. It isn't there because you think you will get spooled. It's there to properly fill the reel to where the flyline comes to within about 1/8 inch of the reel pillars when loaded onto the spool, and it also allows for larger turns of the line on the spool thus increasing the line recovery rate. These larger diameter turns also result in less line twist/memory/coiling. I never load a small reel without backing. If the reel is very small, I'd use a Double Taper line, cut in half, with half set aside for reuse after wearing out the first half. I'd then add 100 yards of backing or whatever would make the remaining flyline load properly.

Just my take.

Yeah gabe, what this guy said.

exactly the reason I prefer UL mid arbors...
just saying
User avatar
gabe
 
Posts: 553
Joined: August 4th, 2008, 3:18 pm
Location: SoCal

Previous

Return to General Fly Fishing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests