REALTIME FLOWS    U. Kern: n/a cfs    L. Kern: 1341 cfs    E.W: 312 cfs    U. Owens: 108 cfs    L. Owens: 496 cfs   09/02/19 1:15 PM PST

At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

For topics that don't seem to have a home elsewhere.

At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby planettrout » October 18th, 2010, 9:24 pm

Flyjunkies favorite pals (not) have filed another lawsuit...

http://news.sierrawave.net/index.php?op ... mid=200021


PT/TB :fireangry:
Daughter to Father, "How many arms do you have? How many fly rods do you need?"


http://planettrout.wordpress.com/
User avatar
planettrout
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: December 6th, 2008, 11:22 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA / Pullman, WA

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby beachbum » October 18th, 2010, 9:50 pm

I took a look at their staff, and it's pretty impressive. There seems to be a lot of UC Berkley in the credits. The fishing advocates need to step up and not let them dominate the conversation.
Set the hook!
Image
User avatar
beachbum
 
Posts: 3616
Joined: December 3rd, 2008, 2:54 pm
Location: Camarillo, CA

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby WanderingBlues » October 19th, 2010, 5:26 am

I would imagine that there are some deep pockets on our side of this issue. The fishing tourism dollars are pretty important to a lot of businesses and towns. In any event, an email to your local rep might not be a bad thing.
"We're a cross between our parents and hippies in a tent...."
180 Degrees South
User avatar
WanderingBlues
 
Posts: 5299
Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 10:49 am
Location: Living in a Tin Can

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby RiverRat » October 19th, 2010, 8:00 am

You could see this coming from a mile away after reading the final EIR last year. The DFG had already curtailed private stocking for the little guys but now it looks like the big guys are a target. Sucks!

shane
RiverRat
 
Posts: 749
Joined: August 10th, 2008, 9:57 am
Location: Bakersfield

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby Rockstar Fisherman » October 19th, 2010, 8:23 am

So does this mean that Alpers and the Bridgeport trout foundation are part of the direct targets this time?
"Live life before you die"
States fished: AZ, CA, NV, OR, WY, MT, IN, WI, ID, UT
Foreign Countries fished: CZ, NZ, SL, PL, CI
User avatar
Rockstar Fisherman
 
Posts: 1857
Joined: September 12th, 2008, 12:24 am
Location: Pocatello, Idaho

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby briansII » October 19th, 2010, 8:31 am

beachbum wrote:I took a look at their staff, and it's pretty impressive. There seems to be a lot of UC Berkley in the credits.


.....and if that wasn't bad enough, ;) lots of on staff legal advise. Lawyers. :(

briansII
User avatar
briansII
 
Posts: 4902
Joined: September 3rd, 2008, 12:39 pm
Location: Central Ca.

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby fflutterffly » October 19th, 2010, 1:42 pm

I'm beginning to think they are in partners with PETA!
EVERY DAY A VICTORY, EVERY YEAR A TRIUMPH
fflutterffly
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: March 16th, 2008, 6:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby lucfish » October 19th, 2010, 3:04 pm

I'm just getting so sick of all of this. If it goes through guys like Tim will be done.
User avatar
lucfish
 
Posts: 3671
Joined: April 15th, 2009, 3:28 pm
Location: canyon lake, calif

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby Sasha » October 19th, 2010, 6:46 pm

Hmmmm I seem to be having trouble with the link. Cliff notes anybody?
User avatar
Sasha
 
Posts: 3885
Joined: July 11th, 2008, 10:42 pm
Location: The 208

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby planettrout » October 19th, 2010, 7:53 pm

CLIFF NOTES:

"As a result of a lawsuit filed by the Center of Biodiversity, the State Department of Fish and Game will consider an order that Troutall trout farm operators prepare an Environmental Impact Report to examine 87 species of concern. Tim Alpers of Conway Ranch sent out the word on what some say could impact trout planting all over California.

Next month the State Fish and Game Commission will vote on the requirement that trout farm owners prepare an EIR on 87 plants, insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals that could be affected by planted trout. The owners, like Time Alpers, will have to foot the bill for the EIR.

The California Association for Recreational Fishing has launched a campaign to stop what they call unreasonable regulations. Their website says that Fish and Game's new EIR rule would impose "an insurmountable inspection and certification requirement for fish stocking in public and private ponds, lakes, streams and county parks - many of which have stocked fish from state hatcheries and private aquaculture farms for more than 120 years."

The Center for Biodiversity had claimed that planted trout eat the same insects needed by many species of birds and frogs.

Alpers and others urge citizens to contact their supervisors and legislators. The issue will come up at an Inyo County Fisheries Commission meeting Thursday at 3pm in the Bishop office of Fish and Game."

From The Sierra Wave...


PT/TB :doh:
Daughter to Father, "How many arms do you have? How many fly rods do you need?"


http://planettrout.wordpress.com/
User avatar
planettrout
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: December 6th, 2008, 11:22 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA / Pullman, WA

Re: At IT Again, EIR for private Trout plants...

Postby Sasha » October 19th, 2010, 8:42 pm

planettrout wrote:CLIFF NOTES:

"As a result of a lawsuit filed by the Center of Biodiversity, the State Department of Fish and Game will consider an order that Troutall trout farm operators prepare an Environmental Impact Report to examine 87 species of concern. Tim Alpers of Conway Ranch sent out the word on what some say could impact trout planting all over California.

Next month the State Fish and Game Commission will vote on the requirement that trout farm owners prepare an EIR on 87 plants, insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals that could be affected by planted trout. The owners, like Time Alpers, will have to foot the bill for the EIR.

The California Association for Recreational Fishing has launched a campaign to stop what they call unreasonable regulations. Their website says that Fish and Game's new EIR rule would impose "an insurmountable inspection and certification requirement for fish stocking in public and private ponds, lakes, streams and county parks - many of which have stocked fish from state hatcheries and private aquaculture farms for more than 120 years."

The Center for Biodiversity had claimed that planted trout eat the same insects needed by many species of birds and frogs.

Alpers and others urge citizens to contact their supervisors and legislators. The issue will come up at an Inyo County Fisheries Commission meeting Thursday at 3pm in the Bishop office of Fish and Game."

From The Sierra Wave...


PT/TB :doh:



Just wondering what impact planting trout would have on plants :?

Why don't they focus their efforts on dam removal :bananadance:
User avatar
Sasha
 
Posts: 3885
Joined: July 11th, 2008, 10:42 pm
Location: The 208


Return to General Fly Fishing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 135 guests

cron