REALTIME FLOWS    U. Kern: n/a cfs    L. Kern: 1341 cfs    E.W: 312 cfs    U. Owens: 108 cfs    L. Owens: 496 cfs   09/02/19 1:15 PM PST

NIMBY

For topics that don't seem to have a home elsewhere.

Re: NIMBY

Postby Benny » March 14th, 2012, 8:23 am

Curtis, this is a terrible situation for sure. Wish you and your family, and not to mention all the nearby residents luck with what seems like a really tough battle.
Benny
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 28th, 2008, 11:11 pm

Re: NIMBY

Postby Flatsix » March 14th, 2012, 9:13 pm

After looking out off your deck on Saturday, I'd be * if I were you.

Just a thought....

Work the environmental angle as hard as possible. Get as many agencies involved as possible.

If you find out that the native bug eyed spotted wax wing purple beetle is being displaced, call somebody.

Work that "rehab within 200 yds of the school" angle. Call the San Berdo Co dept of education and squawk.

If you can get someone to verify that the developer is doing something illegal or un environmental, call KABC for a return trip.

Find out what the regulations are in regard to work hours and start stop times. Start too early make a call, work too late, make a call etc.

Find out if there are any dust restrictions, debris restrictions, leaking oil restrictions etc and make them conform.

Get the neighbors together to hang some kind of FU signs off their decks to let everyone know how you feel.

I'd be the biggest PIA as possible. This thing sucks. Being surrounded by 6 man bunkhouses full of sketchers isn't my idea of mountain living.

:fireangry:
User avatar
Flatsix
 
Posts: 436
Joined: March 3rd, 2010, 1:35 pm
Location: Upland

Re: NIMBY

Postby oarfish » March 15th, 2012, 9:52 am

Feel sorry for you guys, it won't be a safe place anymore. Some where down the road those homes will be sold as single family homes.
Rick
oarfish
 
Posts: 2
Joined: March 12th, 2012, 3:02 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: NIMBY

Postby Artin » March 15th, 2012, 10:17 am

Flatsix wrote:After looking out off your deck on Saturday, I'd be * if I were you.

Just a thought....

Work the environmental angle as hard as possible. Get as many agencies involved as possible.

If you find out that the native bug eyed spotted wax wing purple beetle is being displaced, call somebody.

Work that "rehab within 200 yds of the school" angle. Call the San Berdo Co dept of education and squawk.

If you can get someone to verify that the developer is doing something illegal or un environmental, call KABC for a return trip.

Find out what the regulations are in regard to work hours and start stop times. Start too early make a call, work too late, make a call etc.

Find out if there are any dust restrictions, debris restrictions, leaking oil restrictions etc and make them conform.

Get the neighbors together to hang some kind of FU signs off their decks to let everyone know how you feel.

I'd be the biggest PIA as possible. This thing sucks. Being surrounded by 6 man bunkhouses full of sketchers isn't my idea of mountain living.

:fireangry:


X2

Well said


Artin
ethics is something you do when no one is watching
User avatar
Artin
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 3:12 pm

Re: NIMBY

Postby Jimbo Roberts » March 15th, 2012, 11:03 am

If the builder altered the streambed, you could get the Army Core of Engineers or even your California Fish and Game involved. They would at least make him comply with enviromental laws and pay for an enviromental impact study plus remediation, which could cost him plenty.

Jimbo
Jimbo Roberts
 
Posts: 1329
Joined: October 19th, 2011, 7:47 pm
Location: San Antonio Texas

Re: NIMBY

Postby WanderingBlues » March 16th, 2012, 9:10 am

Jimbo Roberts wrote:If the builder altered the streambed, you could get the Army Core of Engineers or even your California Fish and Game involved. They would at least make him comply with enviromental laws and pay for an enviromental impact study plus remediation, which could cost him plenty.

Jimbo


We have those entities involved, plus the State Water Board. They have issued restoration orders and may start fining soon.

And just to be clear because I sometimes get a head of steam going without slowing down, I don't have any disdain for folks with addiction issues who seek help. I've experienced it on both sides of my family and with close friends. These homes, however, are purely cash cows for owners who stand to make up to $36k a month per home, funded by us, the tax payers. There's little interest in recovery. In fact, recidivism runs at about 93% in these facilities

Even our local Al Anon leader has come out against these homes.
"We're a cross between our parents and hippies in a tent...."
180 Degrees South
User avatar
WanderingBlues
 
Posts: 5299
Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 10:49 am
Location: Living in a Tin Can

Re: NIMBY

Postby fly addict » March 16th, 2012, 10:01 am

Curtis,
I’m not suggesting you break the law, but I bet a few of these would solve your problem!
Image
;)
Mark
Make Fly Fishing Great Again!
User avatar
fly addict
 
Posts: 2560
Joined: August 3rd, 2008, 1:57 pm
Location: In your honey hole!

Re: NIMBY

Postby teejay » March 18th, 2012, 7:16 pm

Curtis,
Sounds like every homeowner’s nightmare.
This organization may be able to offer help/advice:

http://friendsofthemountain.org/Index.html

Good luck!
User avatar
teejay
 
Posts: 388
Joined: April 2nd, 2010, 12:00 am
Location: Nomad

Re: NIMBY

Postby RSetina » March 18th, 2012, 9:59 pm

There's a facility like that on my route and I'm sorry to say, they don't look like the more upstanding people. I've left packages there and, knock on wood, they haven't made a claim so maybe they aren't so bad, but to have them next to you home is another matter. Sorry to hear about them moving in.

Heck, make sure they see you in uniform a few time a week. That will put a little fear of God into them should your fight to stop it be unsuccessful.
Rick

Other Websites
TenkaraUSA
User avatar
RSetina
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: August 21st, 2008, 9:56 pm

Re: NIMBY

Postby Artin » March 19th, 2012, 5:47 am

RSetina wrote:Heck, make sure they see you in uniform a few time a week. That will put a little fear of God into them should your fight to stop it be unsuccessful.


Not a bad idea at all. This really stinks. $36k a month huh? what a waste of tax money. I am sure the owners are really concerned about the tenants. I mean there is no incentive for relapse of course.

Artin
ethics is something you do when no one is watching
User avatar
Artin
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 3:12 pm

Previous

Return to General Fly Fishing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 107 guests

cron