Jimbo Roberts wrote:
Sounds like making the East Fork a national recreational area is your best bet. I would organize all the local enviromental groups, Sierra Club, Trout Unlimited, etc and make it happen.
Jimbo
Flatsix wrote:Either that or the Sierra Club or some other environmental group may shut it down completely.
flybob wrote:Sparky, Creek, as I said in my original post at the top of this post, the reality and repercussion of shutting down the 39 (HWY), is that they (the abusers) are in fact quite resourceful, and will move to the next canyon that is still open and just do the same there! And so on and so on, where does it end? It will not, at least not in the lifetime of anybody on this board!
DrCreek wrote:These days, if there isn't "something in it" for someone either near or at the top (read: politicain), it's a lost cause. It's a shame that stream is so far gone.
Sparky of SoCal wrote:I think educating the public can only go so far... I think the biggest perpetrators don’t care what they’re doing to their planet. They are not worried about how they leave their area when done and why should they.
Eric wrote:Curtis do what a couple of us do. Give one day a month back to the stream and volunteer by picking up some trash,painting some rocks and just talking to the public. And hope it makes a difference.
Eric
flybob wrote:csimcox wrote:For the most part, they are very hard working industrious people.....this is just how they play!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest