I first tried a tenkara rod 4-5 years ago and bought my Tanuki Ninja Tenkara Rod about 2 months ago.
My review comments cover the Tanuki rod and the tenkara community.
The Tanuki Ninja is 11 1/2 feet long, comes 8 segments and weighs mere ounces. I purchased a package deal that included a floating line (braided) for dry flies and a monofilament line for nymphing. The package came with a rod sack and a plastic tube. I opted for a heavier duty tube. The package is attractive and seems well made. The maker is starting up (relatively) and is very responsive to customer comments. Other accessories like the line holder are innovative with a flexible seal to keep line from unraveling.
The Kern is flowing too fast to use the rod so my first times were creeking and on the S Fork. Tenkara has its historical basis (idiosyncrasies) that vary significantly from rod and reel fishing. The 11 1/2 foot rod came 12 and 13 foot lines to that receives tippet length (of your choice (5X provided). A loop secures the fly line to an overhand knot on the rod. The procedure to protect the rod segments is to pull out smallest segments first while unreeling line from the holder. The system is very simple, but cumbersome in its simplicity compared to a reel.
The line casting is easily learned and accuracy could be easily achieved with some practice. The fixed line and length of rod creates a quick awareness of overhead clearances as well brush clearances. The length of the rod gives specific control over the flies, if clearances are available. The tip section is fine and delicate - any vegetation hookups should be persuaded to undo by hand only. For the creeks, the option to drop into pools was good, if there was no vegetation or wind.
The rod are very flexible and there is an unfamiliar way the rod flex is described. With dry flies, the visual takes were easily seen, but I wonder if a nymphing take would be felt with the flexible tips. It seems a multi-color or other sighter would be needed for visual confirmation of a take.
The rod collapse to about a two foot section when not fishing, but the slow procedure when moving from one clear creek spot, through brush, to the next clear spot encouraged me to work through bush with 11 1/2 feet ot rod to maneuver.
The tenkara community seems to be championed by folks who were not originally fly fishers. The descriptive language is as unrelated as English and Japanese. The designations that enable a rod and reel fly fisher to understand the difference between a 2-wt and a 10-wt rod are completely absent in tenkara descriptions. One comment I got was that any length rod used for creek trout would work equally well for salmon and steelhead. On some sense that may be true, generally it seems like a lack of experience.
The whole aspect of rod feel, line stretch, casting feel, the feel of a take, and how to change those variables is a mystery. The tenkara vocabulary only served to frustrate any descriptions or personal understanding. There was lot of reference to try it out so you can 'feel' it, but how much time can you spend trying and where can you try things on a fishing basis.
The ability to play more physical option to control the fly with a fixed length rod was useful to know. The challenge of tenkara-speak is not existent for a fly fisher that starts with tenkara, but the bridges to convert existing reel and rod fishers do not seem to exist.
Let me know what your perceptions are!
Ants